Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut a lorem consequat, tincidunt augue vitae, mollis tortor. Nullam commodo quam arcu, sed sagittis felis tincidunt placerat. Curabitur quis aliquet lacus. Maecenas ultricies neque eget elementum ultricies. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Quisque neque massa, luctus et augue in, volutpat egestas lorem. Mauris sit amet facilisis urna. Aenean facilisis vestibulum elit, id gravida risus accumsan sed. Aliquam finibus mi eget purus porttitor, vitae rutrum felis porttitor.
Fusce lacinia euismod erat, eget volutpat mi rhoncus non. Etiam tempus orci non dui rutrum, vitae malesuada justo hendrerit. Maecenas imperdiet lorem laoreet, suscipit velit vel, rhoncus nunc. Sed consequat felis id lacus sodales tristique. Curabitur ut mauris magna. Ut volutpat lectus at molestie dapibus. Duis facilisis risus sed justo lacinia, ac fringilla massa fermentum. Praesent id pharetra ipsum, tincidunt sollicitudin augue. Proin sed enim nibh. Curabitur tempus nulla risus, vitae sodales quam eleifend id. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Nullam ut dolor sodales, elementum dui a, finibus augue. Sed vitae aliquet tortor, non malesuada ipsum. Vestibulum massa nulla, blandit vel consectetur nec, sodales at mauris. Praesent ornare nibh ac nunc cursus mattis.
Cras sollicitudin et erat imperdiet pulvinar. Aliquam odio felis, elementum non libero eget, tempus porttitor massa. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Mauris elementum aliquam volutpat. Ut tincidunt ornare lectus, sit amet vestibulum velit vestibulum eu. Vestibulum accumsan nec elit quis elementum. Donec pharetra porta condimentum. Maecenas quis turpis in augue pharetra efficitur. Proin hendrerit molestie sem a facilisis.
Cras sed nisl est. Donec imperdiet est sit amet odio molestie, vitae dignissim lectus ornare. In mattis mi ac efficitur auctor. Etiam non nulla orci. Vestibulum ultrices id libero non tincidunt. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Integer dignissim pellentesque lectus, id elementum lacus imperdiet ut. Fusce finibus velit enim, quis varius arcu ornare eget. Morbi quis lacus nibh. Nullam luctus ligula turpis, a interdum augue pulvinar eu. Nunc ac nisi in urna consequat lobortis in pulvinar diam. Ut a malesuada nulla. Morbi ultricies semper hendrerit.
Praesent euismod urna ipsum, sed ullamcorper urna sagittis egestas. Donec dignissim est tempor libero facilisis accumsan. Phasellus pretium, magna nec scelerisque vehicula, sapien tellus ultricies nulla, et condimentum orci massa congue est. Pellentesque tempor mattis purus a finibus. Fusce convallis magna id neque ornare, sed scelerisque lacus fermentum. Duis nec scelerisque ante. Morbi ante diam, finibus vel neque eu, dictum condimentum massa. Aenean at bibendum ligula, quis molestie orci. Donec at leo faucibus, molestie tellus sit amet, finibus nisl. Nunc fermentum orci sed nulla faucibus, vel ultricies felis placerat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam consectetur enim at libero bibendum aliquet. Nulla vel accumsan mi.
In 1990, noted palaeontologist Stephen Jay Gould spoke at the Royal Ontario Museum about the fossils of the Burgess Shale. While many of Gould’s interpretations have been challenged, his talk provides a snapshot of how the organisms were viewed then. (6:20)
So this is Marrella. I should say that arthropods are classified primarily by numbers of segments and patterns in their various body parts.
And here’s Marrella, it’s an arthropod that doesn’t fit into any group. It has these two sets of spines… there it is. It doesn’t have any allegiance.
So Whittington was puzzled when he first published on Marrella in 1971 but he went on and the next creature he studied was Yohoia.
Looked like a shrimp, had been called one by Walcott, and again, as Whittington studied it with care, it just didn’t fit into any modern group. It looks like a shrimp superficially, but when you start counting the segments you don’t have anything like the crustacean body plan.
For instance, up in the head you have this unique set of frontal appendages which have no homologue anywhere else in the arthropods. Whittington ended up calling them simply “the great appendages” because he didn’t know what to do with them.
This is Odaraia, a creature that swims on its back and has a tail fluke that looks more like a whale than an arthropod, but again, not allied to anything.
Looked vaguely like a swimming crustacean, but isn’t when you look at the segments and their patterns of the tail.
This is Sidneyia, which was described by Walcott as a chelicerate, that is a member of the horseshoe crab, eventually the spider-scorpion group. And in some superficial sense that’s what it looks like. But in detail it isn’t.
All chelicerates have six pairs of appendages on their head. Sidneyia has one pair. It’s not like anything… just these antennae… it’s not like anything else… it is just is what it is.
This is Habelia, an odd creature…
… with tubercules all over its body.
This is Leanchoilia, my personal favourite for elegance, but not among the survivors.
Again, these odd great appendages, as Whittington calls them, with their whiplash endings.
This is Aysheaia.
Now, this creature is probably an onychophore, that is it is a member of a modern group symbolized by the genus with the wonderful name Peripatus, which is a not very well known group, but it’s thought to be possibly intermediary between annelids and arthropods and may be the ancestor of the insect group. So here we may have a creature that is truly related to one of the surviving groups of arthropods.
And here is a form that Des Collins found and initially gave a field name, following paleontological tradition…
… he called it “Santa Claws”. And eventually named it Sanctacaris, which means much the same thing. Now again, does it look any different than the ones I just showed you?
Would you have picked out this creature for success? Could you have predicted that this, by virtue of superiority would go on? Yet it looks as though Sanctacaris really is a chelicerate.
There are six pairs of appendages in the right place on the head so this animal may be at least a cousin to one of the successful lineages. Again, would you have known? Could anyone have known?
This is Opabinia. Opabinia, I think, should stand as one of the great moments in the history of human knowledge.
Because Opabinia, which was described as an arthropod, a shrimp-like creature, by Walcott, who shoehorned it into modern groups as he always did. Opabinia was the first creature re-studied by Whittington that broke the conceptual dam, so to speak, and gave insights into this new world.
Because Whittington began his studies in the early 1970s on Opabinia thinking it would be an arthropod. He realizes, as Walcott did not, that there was some three-dimensionality in these creatures, that they were not just films on the rock.
That he could therefore dissect through and find structures underneath. So he said “Now I can resolve this, I’ll dissect through the body and find the appendages underneath which will prove its arthropod nature. He dissected through and he found nothing. There are no appendages.
And as he reconstructed Opabinia, he came to understand it is not an arthropod, it is some bizarre creature of its own unique anatomy. And in publishing a monograph on Opabinia in 1975 I think you have the breakthrough point in the new interpretation of the Burgess Shale.
Here is Marianne’s picture of Opabinia, a bizarre creature with five-count them, five-eyes, this vacuum-cleaner like nozzle with a food-collecting device in front, this bellows-like apparatus behind, followed by a tail. I don’t know what it is. It’s just weird.
This is Nectocaris, a peculiar creature that looks like a chordate behind, combined with a fin ray…
… and more like an octopod in the front. Who knows?
This is Dinomischus, a peculiar, stalked, stemmed creature…
… with no known affinity to anything else.
This is Odontogriphus, literally meaning “the toothed mystery” a good name.
A flat, gelatinous, annulated creature with a row of tooth-like structures surrounding a mouth and a pair of sensory palps.
Walcott described three separate genera which he allocated, as was his wont, according to the shoehorn, into three conventional groups.
This animal he called a jellyfish and called Peytoia.
This creature he called a sea cucumber and called Laggania.
And this, which had been described before and looks like the body of an arthropod, he called (it had been named before) Anomalocaris, meaning “the odd shrimp”. Well I think that you’ve guessed it already.
It turns out that all three go together. They form a single creature which is one of the weirdest of all the odd animals of the Burgess.
It’s also the largest Cambrian organism. Some specimens are almost a metre in length.
The so-called jellyfish is the mouth of this creature, working on a circular, nutcracker principle rather than the jaw of vertebrates principle.
The Anomalocaris itself turns out to be one of a pair of feeding appendages, and the so-called sea cucumber is the body of the whole animal.