Mega Zoom & Pan Image Zoomer image with id 0 does not exist!

Mega Zoom & Pan Image Viewer with preset id 0 does not exist!

Waptia fieldensis

One of the best preserved Burgess Shale arthropods, with unique morphology

Reconstruction of Waptia fieldensis.

© MARIANNE COLLINS

Taxonomy:

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Higher Taxonomic assignment: Hymenocarines, Family Protocarididae (Miller 1889).
Species name: Waptia fieldensis
Remarks:

Waptia belongs to its own family, Waptiidae, along with a few other similar forms, most notably Chuandianella from China (Hou & Bergström 1991). Outside of its palp-bearing mandibles, Waptia possesses limbs with 5-segmented distal branches typical of pancrustaceans (the group including crustaceans and hexapods) (Vannier et al. 2018), but the pancrustacean affinity of waptiids and other hymenocarines remains in question.

Described by: Walcott
Description date: 1912
Etymology:

Waptia – from Wapta Mountain (2,778 m), just north of Fossil Ridge, in British Columbia, Canada, named after the Stoney First Nation Nakoda word “Wapta” meaning “running water”.

fieldensis – from Field, the mountain peak (2,643 m) and small town near Fossil Ridge, British Columbia, Canada. The name was given by William Cornelius Van Horne (General Manager of the Canadian Pacific Railway), to honor Cyrus West Field, a promoter of the first telegraph cable across the Atlantic Ocean.

Type Specimens: Holotype USNM80483, in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Other species:

Burgess Shale and vicinity: none.

Other deposits: Waptia cf. fieldensis from the Spence Shale Member of the Langston Formation, Utah (Briggs et al. 2008).

Age & Localities:

Age:
Middle Cambrian, Wuliuan stage, Burgess Shale Formation (approximately 505 million years ago).
Principal localities:

The Walcott and Raymond Quarries on Fossil Ridge

History of Research:

Brief history of research:

Waptia was first described by Walcott (1912), who designated Waptia fieldensis as the type species of the genus. Various authors commented on its affinities (e.g., Briggs 1983; Briggs et al. 1994; Hou & Bergström 1997; Walossek & Müller 1998; Wills et al. 1998; Bergström & Hou 2005). Waptia cf. fieldensis has been described from the Spence Shale in Utah (Briggs et al. 2008), and Waptia has been compared to Pauloterminus spinodorsalis from the Sirius Passet biota in North Greenland (Taylor 2002). Waptia-like specimens from southwest China (Li 1975; Hou & Bergström 1991) were at one point assigned to Waptia (Chen 2004), but a re-examination of the specimens showed they were different enough to be assigned to their own genus, Chuandianella (Liu & Shu 2004, 2008; Hou et al. 2009; Zhai et al. 2022). Waptia specimens from the Burgess Shale were more recently comprehensively restudied and redescribed by Vannier et al. (2018), documenting clear mandibulate affinities and possible shared characters with pancrustaceans. Waptia and Chuandianella have also served to document early brood care via the preservation of eggs under the carapace, with different egg sizes between genera (Caron & Vannier 2016; Ou et al. 2020), and later developmental stages (Liu et al. 2022).

Description:

Morphology:

Like other hymenocarines, Waptia has a tubular body with segmental “rings” enclosed in a bivalved carapace. Mandibles are well developed and located very anteriorly, close to the insertion of the two large, pedunculate eyes and elongate antennules, without evidence of post-antennular appendage. Between the eyes, a sclerite covers additional sensory organs. It also bears paired semi-rigid flaps for its tailpiece, called caudal rami. However, the morphoanatomy of Waptia also substantially departs from that of other hymenocarines. The maxillules, behind the mandibules, are differentiated, bearing a rounded brush-like element distally. The following three pairs of appendages are similar and raptorial: they are uniramous, with four basal podomeres (limb segments) bearing strong spinose extensions called endites, and five terminal podomeres, including the claw. The seventh pair of appendage has a similar distal part with five podomeres, but the basal part is instead made of annulations bearing short lamellae. The following six pairs are entirely annulated, and bear much longer and wider lamellae. Body segments bearing these limbs are distinct, but segments housing the last two pairs are fused. The remaining posterior body is an abdomen (limbless).

Abundance:

Waptia is common in the Burgess Shale, with over 1,400 specimens collected from the Walcott Quarry (Conway Morris 1986; Caron & Jackson 2008) and 70 specimens collected from the Raymond Quarry.

Maximum Size:
About 8 cm.

Ecology:

Life habits: Nektobenthic, Mobile
Feeding strategies: Predator
Ecological Interpretations:

The large lamellar thoracic appendages of Waptia clearly point to a swimming lifestyle. The frontal “basket” of raptorial limbs and mandibles with palps point in turn to a distinct role in predation, food manipulation and mastication. Similar to a number of modern crustaceans, like shrimps, Waptia was brooding eggs under its carapace rather than depositing them in sediment.

References:

  • ARIA, C. and CARON, J. B. 2017. Burgess Shale fossils illustrate the origin of the mandibulate body plan. Nature, 545, 89–92.
  • BERGSTRÖM, J. and HOU, X. 2005. Early Palaeozoic non-lamellipedian arthropods. In KOENEMANN, S. and R. A. JENNER, R. A. (eds.) Crustaceans and Arthropod Relationships, Festschrift for Fredrick R. Schram., Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, London, New York, Singapore., 73–93 pp.
  • BRIGGS, D. E. G. 1983. Affinities and early evolution of the Crustacea: the evidence of the Cambrian fossils. In Crustacean Phylogeny. Crustacean Issues, Vol. 1. Taylor & Francis, Rotterdam, 1–22 pp.
  • BRIGGS, D. E. G., ERWIN, D. H. and COLLIER, F. J. 1994. The fossils of the Burgess Shale. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  • BRIGGS, D. E. G., LIEBERMAN, B. S., HENDRICKS, J. R., HALGEDAHL, S. L. and JARRARD, R. D. 2008. Middle Cambrian arthropods from Utah. J Paleontol, 82, 238–254.
  • CARON, J. B. and JACKSON, D. A. 2008. Paleoecology of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 258, 222–256.
  • CARON, J.-B. and VANNIER, J. 2016. Waptia and the diversification of brood care in early arthropods. Current Biology, 26, 69–74.
  • CHEN, J. Y. 2004. The Dawn of Animal World. Jiangsu Science and Technical Press, Nanjing.
  • CONWAY MORRIS, S. 1986. The community structure of the Middle Cambrian phyllopod bed (Burgess Shale). Palaeontology, 29, 423–467.
  • HOU, X. G. and BERGSTRÖM, J. 1991. The arthropods of the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, with relationships and evolutionary significance. In SIMONETTA, A. M. and CONWAY MORRIS, S. (eds.) The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa., Cambridge University Press, Camerino, 179–187 pp.
  • HOU, X. G. and BERGSTRÖM, J. 1997. Arthropods of the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, southwest China. Fossils and Strata, 45, 1–116.
  • HOU, X.-G., SIVETER, D. J., ALDRIDGE, R. J. and SIVETER, D. J. 2009. A new arthropod in chain-like associations from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (Lower Cambrian), Yunnan, China. Palaeontology, 52, 951–961.
  • LI, Y. 1975. On the Cambrian ostracods with new material from Sichuan, Yunnan and Shaanxi, China. Professional Papers on Stratigraphy & Palaeontology, 2, 37–72.
  • LIU, C., FU, D. and ZHANG, X. 2022. Developmental dynamics is revealed in the early Cambrian arthropod Chuandianella ovata. IScience, 25, 103591.
  • LIU, H. and SHU, D. 2004. New information on Chuandianella from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna, Yunnan, China. Journal of Northwest University, 34, 453-456 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  • LIU, H. and SHU, D. 2008. Chuandianella ovata from Lower Cambrian Chengjiang biota. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 47, 352–361.
  • MILLER, S. A. 1889. North American geology and palaeontology for the use of amateurs, students and scientists. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati.
  • OU, Q., VANNIER, J., YANG, X., CHEN, A., MAI, H., SHU, D., HAN, J., FU, D., WANG, R. and MAYER, G. 2020. Evolutionary trade-off in reproduction of Cambrian arthropods. Science Advances, 6, eaaz3376.
  • TAYLOR, R. S. 2002. A new bivalved arthropod from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet fauna, North Greenland. Palaeontology, 45, 97–123.
  • VANNIER, J., ARIA, C., TAYLOR, R. S. and CARON, J. B. 2018. Waptia fieldensis Walcott, a mandibulate arthropod from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Royal Society Open Science, 5:172206.
  • WALCOTT, C. 1912. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology II. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57(6), 145–228.
  • WALOSSEK, D. and MÜLLER, K. J. 1998. Cambrian ’Orsten’-type arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea. In FORTEY, R. R. and THOMAS, R. (eds.) Arthropod Relationships, Chapman & Hall, London, 139–153 pp.
  • WILLS, M. A., BRIGGS, D. E. G., FORTEY, R. A., WILKINSON, M. and SNEATH, P. H. A. 1998. An arthropod phylogeny based on fossil and recent taxa. In EDGECOMBE, G. D. (ed.) Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny, Columbia University Press, New York, 33–105 pp.
  • ZHAI, D., WILLIAMS, M., SIVETER, D., SIVETER, D., HARVEY, T., SANSOM, R., MAI, H., ZHOU, R. and HOU, X. 2022. Chuandianella ovata: An early Cambrian stem euarthropod with feather-like appendages. Palaeontologia Electronica.
Other Links:

http://paleobiology.si.edu/burgess/waptia.html